This study is absolutely fantastic! (well, that's my opinion).
It is very enjoyable to look for because it is hard to go wrong.
However, W and B play is very rich. The solution is indisputable, the variants are clear.
However, it seems to me almost impossible to find the right Black resources.
A little help to get started: the second B move: 2:...Rf-d2 is interesting and the W win must be found.
Then you have to look for a better B move than RTf-d2. And it goes on like that for more than 10 moves.
Bravo !
This study could be used as an excellent support for a whole lesson in a club.
Homework for the next lesson: 2 positions where White plays and try to draw.
Now, the game.
Obviously I should have written down more things to make an interesting commentary, but as I said I was quite overwhelmed with the task.
Karpov Gelfand
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 dxc4 5.Qa4+ (calmer than the 5.e4 Bb4 6.Bg5 c5 he played the same year against Timman)
5...c6 6.Qxc4 b5 7.Qd3 Bb7 8.e4 b4 (Here, the move..Nbd7 is bad because of 9.e5 Nd5 10.Nxd5)
9.Na4 Nbd7 10.Bg5 Qa5 11.b3 c5 12.Bxf6 (taking advantage that on 12...Nxf6? 13.Qb5+ Qxb5 14.Bxb5+ Kd8 15.Ne5 Rg816.f3 with advantage W).
12..gxf6 13.Be2 0–0–0 14.0–0 Kb8 (was not to be feared 14...Ne5 15.Nxe5 fxe5 16.d5 exd5 17.exd5 Rxd5 18.Qf5 Kb8 19.Bf3 or 16...Bxd5 17.Rfd1 Be6 18.Qe3 and the activity largely compensates the pawn)
15.d5 Nb6 (15...f5 is thematic and playable as well as 15…Bd6 16.dxe Nb6)
16.Nxb6 Qb6 17.Rad1 (17...f5 again was playable. Karpov had planned 17...exd 18.exd Rd5 19.Qd5 Bd5 20.Rd5 with an unchallengeable white B, a Nf5, the doubling of the R, in short a position which, if not winning, will be quite unpleasant to endure with Karpov in the driving seat)
17..Bh6 18.Qc4 Rd6 19.dxe6 Rxe6 (19...fxe6? 20.e5±) 20.Rd5! 20...Rhe8 ! (Since White is ready to give an exchange to maintain his chances of win, B is not in a hurry to take it and will play a series of moves improving his position before taking the exchange, which shows that these guys are not easy to handle: you give them a gift, they answer ok, but I want two) .
21.Bd3 Rd8! 22.Rd1 (22.Rxd8? Qxd8 23.Nh4? Ba6)
22...Red6 23.Be2 Bxd5 24.exd5 Qb7 25.Qh4! (25... Rxd5 26.Rxd5 Qxd5? 27.Qh6! Qd1 28.Bf1)
25...Bf8 26.Bc4 Rxd5 Did Gelfand judge this move correctly or did he eliminate 26...h6 as insufficient and therefore play Rxd5 by default ?
27.Bxd5 Rxd5 28.Re1 Rd8 29.Qxf6 Qc7 30.g3! (30.Ng5? Be7) 30...Bd6 31.Ng5 Rd7 32.Re8+ (Better was the move envisaged by Karpov but rightly discarded by him as he did not see the inhuman move that justified it 32.Nxh7! c4!? 33.Qg5!! c3?! 34.Re8 Rd8 35.Qb5 +- or 33..Qc5 34.bxc! Qxc4? 35.Rc1 Qa6 36.Qg8!)
32...Kb7 33.Ne4 Qc6 34.Qf5 Be7 35.Kg2 Rc7 36.Rh8 Qg6 37.Qd5+ Qc6 38.Qxc6+ Kxc6 39.Rxh7 followed by a technical win.
In order to respect tradition, the meal was enhanced with the fairy complement.
It was the same as for the rest, i.e. the tradition was respected but in its minimal form.
The absence of Rémi's reinforcement prevented the author of these lines from finding more than one problem.
Nevertheless, I managed to get to the bottom of it by unravelling it fairly thoroughly, which I was quite happy with.
Double-step chess
Helpmate 1 move.
Twin: replace the Bg5 by a R.
I will now try to add a little value to my report compared to the Master's.
I know that this kind of thing can put off many players. However, I cannot advise them enough to look for these kinds of compositions from time to time.
Why should they do so? What is the practical interest for a player?
In my opinion, players who look for combinations often do so by unconsciously using patterns they have memorised, which is very detrimental to the development of the imagination.
For example, they can be very proud to find almost a tempo a win in 6 or 7 moves based on 1:Bxh7+ Kxh7, 2:Ng5+ Bxg5 3:hxg5+ (by Rh1) Kg8 4:Qh5 f6 5:g6 and mate next move. But as much as this is difficult to see for the first time, it is automatic afterwards. And the player who sees this immediately often misses gains in 2 moves by lack of imagination.
The interest then of being confronted with modified rules is that imagination becomes our only resource since we are in a context where we have no culture.
Obviously, the rules must be easy to understand and the problem must be accessible, difficulty not being the goal.
So let's look at the exercise
*** h#1 : B starts and plays a move, W answers and checkmates. W and B cooperate to achieve this aim.
*** Twin : same statement by replacing Bishop by a Rook.
*** Double-step chess: Each move consists of the movement of a single piece, but this piece must make two moves (whereas in classical chess, it makes only one). The previous definition leaving several ambiguities, several points are to be specified.
* The move is only allowed if both steps are possible. For example g2-g3 followed by g3-g4 is a legal move in double-step chess, but g2-g4 cannot be the first move because the pawn on g4 would be unable to play a second one.
* The first of the two steps cannot be a capture. Thus, if the bB was on c1, White would not be allowed to play Kxc1 followed by Kc2 because the first move is a capture. On the other hand, they would be allowed to play Kb1-c2 followed by Kc2xc1, (the two moves together constituting a move in double-step chess).
Add a comment